The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 36 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 36 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/printthread.php 16 require_once



IRSE Exam Forum
Train running requirements in each direction - Printable Version

+- IRSE Exam Forum (https://irse.signalpost.org)
+-- Forum: MODULES (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Module 2 (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+---- Forum: Calculations: Past papers & Exercises (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+---- Thread: Train running requirements in each direction (/showthread.php?tid=1059)



Train running requirements in each direction - NJK - 08-08-2012

Dear Members,

I have some doubt in module 2 layout

Train running requirements in each direction

Passenger between A and F (fast) 2 per hour


This 2 train per hour included one train from A and F and another one train from F and A or in one hour 2 train from A and F, and two train from F and A.

Kindly clarify

Regards,
NJK


RE: Train running requirements in each direction - Peter - 08-08-2012

(08-08-2012, 04:45 AM)NJK Wrote: Dear Members,

I have some doubt in module 2 layout

Train running requirements in each direction

Passenger between A and F (fast) 2 per hour


This 2 train per hour included one train from A and F and another one train from F and A or in one hour 2 train from A and F, and two train from F and A.

Kindly clarify

Regards,
NJK

I am not sure which year's layout you are talking about to be able to check the paper, but from the wording you have quoted, the two trains between A and F fast is a qualifier to the phrase "Train running requirements in each direction", so this would be 2 up trains and two down trains per hour between those two points.

Peter


RE: Train running requirements in each direction - NJK - 09-08-2012

(08-08-2012, 09:34 PM)Peter Wrote:
(08-08-2012, 04:45 AM)NJK Wrote: Dear Members,

I have some doubt in module 2 layout

Train running requirements in each direction

Passenger between A and F (fast) 2 per hour


This 2 train per hour included one train from A and F and another one train from F and A or in one hour 2 train from A and F, and two train from F and A.

Kindly clarify

Regards,
NJK

I am not sure which year's layout you are talking about to be able to check the paper, but from the wording you have quoted, the two trains between A and F fast is a qualifier to the phrase "Train running requirements in each direction", so this would be 2 up trains and two down trains per hour between those two points.

Peter

Dear Peter,

This train running requirement I have asked from 2009 Module 2, layout 1. Thanks in advance

Regards,
NJK


RE: Train running requirements in each direction - Jerry1237 - 09-08-2012

From the way it is written, two trains per hour from A to F (i.e. per direction). As always, it is better to write assumptions down when answering.


RE: Train running requirements in each direction - Peter - 09-08-2012

(09-08-2012, 09:30 AM)NJK Wrote:
(08-08-2012, 09:34 PM)Peter Wrote:
(08-08-2012, 04:45 AM)NJK Wrote: Dear Members,

I have some doubt in module 2 layout

Train running requirements in each direction

Passenger between A and F (fast) 2 per hour


This 2 train per hour included one train from A and F and another one train from F and A or in one hour 2 train from A and F, and two train from F and A.

Kindly clarify

Regards,
NJK

I am not sure which year's layout you are talking about to be able to check the paper, but from the wording you have quoted, the two trains between A and F fast is a qualifier to the phrase "Train running requirements in each direction", so this would be 2 up trains and two down trains per hour between those two points.

Peter

Dear Peter,

This train running requirement I have asked from 2009 Module 2, layout 1. Thanks in advance

Regards,
NJK

I've had a look at the paper and this is indeed what they meant.

Peter