+- IRSE Exam Forum (https://irse.signalpost.org)
+-- Forum: MODULES (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Module 3 (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+---- Forum: Control Tables- Past Papers (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+----- Forum: 2004 (https://irse.signalpost.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=113)
+----- Thread: 2004 Point Control Table (/showthread.php?tid=291)
2004 Point Control Table - sugavanam nagarajan - 25-09-2009
Please review 2004 Point Control Table.
-Sugavanam
RE: 2004 Point Control Table - Peter - 29-09-2009
(25-09-2009, 02:21 PM)sugavanam nagarajan Wrote: Please review 2004 Point Control Table.
-Sugavanam
Really sorry not to have looked at this before for you. I'll try and get some comments to you tomorrow.
Peter
RE: 2004 Point Control Table - Peter - 30-09-2009
(29-09-2009, 09:39 PM)Peter Wrote:(25-09-2009, 02:21 PM)sugavanam nagarajan Wrote: Please review 2004 Point Control Table.
-Sugavanam
Really sorry not to have looked at this before for you. I'll try and get some comments to you tomorrow.
Peter
2004 203 and 211
My comments on these to are mostly of the same nature as for the 2006 ones (have a look at the comments on the ones you posted in the other thread) (timed tracks for the O/L, deadlocking tracks - both issues). I agreed with all of the routes and releases. The only areas that I think there is any issue is the representation of the swingining overlap. From what I can see, you have the right sort of idea and, in as far as I could deduce from the way you have written it, the right sort of entries are there, but I was not sure that you have got the presentation correct. You have also put that the points are set N>R and R>N by both 107A(M) and 142B(M) - again, not quite the way it should be shown.
Otherwise, the tables were pretty good.
Peter