Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Q9 Methods of Degraded Mode Operation
#1
Question 9.
On occasions, usually due to failure or intrusive maintenance, it is necessary to operate the railway in the absence of functions normally provided by signalling and telecommunications systems.
Describe three such methods of degraded working, indicating the circumstances in which it would be used, how an acceptable level of safety is maintained and state the residual risks when compared to normal working. [25 marks]


1 attempt
PJW
Reply
#2
Hi,

I have had a go at this one. I have little experience in Operations but I thought that it would be worth having a go since the answer is mostly in the Rule Book!
Reply
#3
(24-09-2011, 01:13 PM)Hort Wrote: Hi,

I have had a go at this one. I have little experience in Operations but I thought that it would be worth having a go since the answer is mostly in the Rule Book!

Indeed.
I thought your answer was pretty good.
A small item is that a signal can only be plated passable if, as well as what you describe, there are no opposing direction moves that could be being made at the time when a driver could arrive at the red signal. In a module 1 question, this is a small detail; rather more important to get it right for mod2 or mod3. Note that it is possible to plate intermediate signals on long single line sections as passable, provided that the whole length of line acquires a "directionality" as soon as a train is signalled into it from one end or the other.
Another issue in your first section is that a verbally authorised can be made over points with failed detection once the signaller has had them operated and secured into the correct position and someone has "walked the route" to confirm.

It would also have been worth mentioning that Single Line Working could be planned to enable an engineering possession of the other line. It is not something which frequently happens on NR (although the story has been that it will be making a come back) but it used to be very common, sometimes for the last few trains on a Saturday night so that work could start on one line several hours before the end of service, sometimes it would continue throughout Sunday. By doing so it would have shown that you had fully addressed the wording re "intrusive maintenance" within the question.

Also should have mentioned the handsignalman would be displaying flags and have put detonators on the track.

Overall though a good attempt; given it was a Mod 1 question I think it would have been good to work a little more in re hazard, likelihood, severity, human error.
i.e. a signalman can institute "Temporary Block Working" along a significant length of uni directional railway, arranging for each driver to be given a ticket telling them which signals to pass and at which one they are to stop, but the risk associated with head-on collision is greater and therefore the additional mitigation of appointing a pilotman. Note however certain single lines are authorised to institute modified block working to keep the traffic flowing even before it is possible to get a pilotman there- it is a short term expedient (therefore hopefully limited likelihood of an incident) and to institute this requires escalation to a senior Ops manager who independently confirms the position of all trains and acts as a detached second person as a cross check on the actions being undertaken on site.

PJW
Reply
#4
Hello hort

1) I would avoid using terms such as "signal is defective" with "signal cannot display a (or the correct) proceed aspect".
2) just refer to people as they, not he/she.
3) I believe it is normal for speed, when being instructed passed a stop aspect, is at such a speeds so as to be able to stop clear of any obstruction.
4) There was another thread discussing a form of ticket working using a pilot describing how it is not always necessary to have the pilot on the train!

Jerry
Le coureur
Reply
#5
1. I believe that "defective" is very much the language used within the Rule Book and hence I see no harm with that.
2. I do agree with Jerry that he/she is awkward; I often try to word for the plural that fortunately in English in unspecific of gender.
3. Does depend on the circumstances. If there is Temporary Block Working established with handsignallers at each end of section and tail lamp checked as a train leaves the section, then the section is known (albeit to a low SIL !) to be clear by virtue of "the human axle counter" and therefore higher speeds are appropriate as it could be a considerable distance. In most cases though it is effectively "drive on sight"

(26-09-2011, 03:51 PM)Jerry1237 Wrote: Hello hort

1) I would avoid using terms such as "signal is defective" with "signal cannot display a (or the correct) proceed aspect".
2) just refer to people as they, not he/she.
3) I believe it is normal for speed, when being instructed passed a stop aspect, is at such a speeds so as to be able to stop clear of any obstruction.
4) There was another thread discussing a form of ticket working using a pilot describing how it is not always necessary to have the pilot on the train!

Jerry

PJW
Reply
#6
sometimes for the last few of trains on the Saturday evening to be able that performance could get begun on one unique areas a big amount of several hours preceding to the accomplish of service, rather quite often it could hold on all through Sunday. By undertaking so it could have confirmed which you obtained definitely addressed the wording re "intrusive maintenance" around the question.




----------------------------------------------------------
Reply
#7
Yes, it would certainly be worth considering whether there is a difference between what could be put into place in circumstances in which the situation could be pre-planned (in order to accommodate scheduled engineering work for intrusive maintenance) compared with a sudden failure scenario.

It was common (not now, but could be changing again) that on mainline UK railways the last few trains on Saturday night as well as much of the Sunday service use just one of the pair of tracks by instituting "single line working" whilst work affecting the other line was undertaken.



(04-04-2012, 03:30 AM)danieljinjin Wrote: sometimes for the last few of trains on the Saturday evening to be able that performance could get begun on one unique areas a big amount of several hours preceding to the accomplish of service, rather quite often it could hold on all through Sunday. By undertaking so it could have confirmed which you obtained definitely addressed the wording re "intrusive maintenance" around the question.




----------------------------------------------------------

PJW
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)