Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2008 mainline layout attempt
#20
(21-09-2009, 08:35 PM)Peter Wrote:
(21-09-2009, 05:32 PM)PJW Wrote:
(19-09-2009, 09:38 AM)PJW Wrote:
(18-09-2009, 04:29 PM)priyman Wrote: please find attached two files, the attemptes for the 2008 mainline layout and the calcs;

I was looking for some general feedback,

thanks,

Priyank

I am working this whole weekend- I might get a chance on Monday or Tuesday evening. However if anyone else wishes to comment earlier ....

OK printed, though twhether I actually have time to look at is questionable. However I have looked at calcs; see attached

I've had a look at the layout. Will try to type in response tomorrow.

Peter

Actually I had just started looking whe I noticed that Peter has reviewed and will be commenting. Hence I'll leave Peter to write his critique and I'll drop onto doing something else.
However although I had yet to start any form of detailed check and was only looking at "artistic impression" I have to say there is quite a lot of red ink over the plan already.

It features quite a lot of the common howlers (DO READ EXAMINERS COMMENTS AT PREVIOUS YEAR'S EXAM REVIEWS AND MAKE SURE YOU AVOID THE HOWLERS):
# very odd ideas about trap points,
# freight yard with lts of signals and motor points but no track circuiting or explanation how it works safely,
# "facing" LOS,
# preset shunt provided in the middle of nowhere fo no good reason,
# I am yet to understand the supposed method of working on the branch (but I wouldn't travel on it!)
# 552/554 placed on gantry for no good reason and prevents the use of stabling sidings by two 180m trains,
# overlaps just measured to be 180m beyond signal and placed without thought within S&C
# point numbering seems to carelessly miss some, switch diamond looks like double slips
# lack of bufferstop lamps and TCI
# inability to be able to make all operational moves specified

Can't say that I am too impressed so far; impression given is that candidate half knows quite lot of stuff but really hasn't prepared well enough and is somewhat confused. Given that the exam is less than a fortnight away there's a lot to learn in the remaining time.
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2008 Mainline Layout - by steve - 07-10-2008, 09:41 AM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by PJW - 07-10-2008, 12:10 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Artur - 07-10-2008, 01:16 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by PJW - 07-10-2008, 01:41 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Artur - 07-10-2008, 02:23 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by nthomso3 - 07-10-2008, 02:37 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by steve - 07-10-2008, 04:49 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Peter - 07-10-2008, 06:09 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by PJW - 16-02-2009, 11:12 AM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Jerry1237 - 18-02-2009, 02:40 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Peter - 18-02-2009, 03:49 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by PJW - 18-02-2009, 05:16 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Jerry1237 - 20-02-2009, 02:46 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by PJW - 20-02-2009, 08:34 PM
RE: 2008 Mainline Layout - by Jerry1237 - 23-02-2009, 11:12 AM
2008 mainline layout attempt - by priyman - 18-09-2009, 04:29 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by PJW - 19-09-2009, 09:38 AM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by PJW - 21-09-2009, 05:32 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by Peter - 21-09-2009, 08:35 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by PJW - 21-09-2009, 09:53 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by Peter - 22-09-2009, 09:58 AM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by MarkN - 05-12-2009, 01:26 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by Peter - 05-12-2009, 10:11 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by PJW - 06-12-2009, 10:43 AM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by priyman - 23-09-2009, 07:46 PM
RE: 2008 mainline layout attempt - by PJW - 23-09-2009, 10:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)