03-02-2010, 12:01 AM
Peter's notes are comprehensive and a fair reflection of what was said. Whilst afterwards there were comments about the take-over of the not-so-young members, those that did want to speak did ask questions.
Personally I was there out of curiosity having sat the exams in 2009. From my own perspective having listened to the examiners and to other candidates a lot of the issues surround preperation - or the lack of it. Perhaps by posting here I'm preeching to the converted though!
Read the exam reviews, decide and state exactly the practice you are using where appropriate and submit practice papers when the oppurtunity arises. If you do them under exam conditions you will get a real flavour of how you are doing. The feedback I recieved from Peter was invaluable - thanks again.
Finally, to prove even the examiners aren't perfect either, both the Mod 5 candidates that got Distinctions didn't do the TC question, if you catch my drift!
Dan
Personally I was there out of curiosity having sat the exams in 2009. From my own perspective having listened to the examiners and to other candidates a lot of the issues surround preperation - or the lack of it. Perhaps by posting here I'm preeching to the converted though!
Read the exam reviews, decide and state exactly the practice you are using where appropriate and submit practice papers when the oppurtunity arises. If you do them under exam conditions you will get a real flavour of how you are doing. The feedback I recieved from Peter was invaluable - thanks again.
Finally, to prove even the examiners aren't perfect either, both the Mod 5 candidates that got Distinctions didn't do the TC question, if you catch my drift!
Dan