08-09-2010, 02:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2010, 02:51 PM by greensky52.)
I do not know why I can not reply to my thread for those 2 days. Any bug with the web?
Following questions are related to your reply to the point CT
1."I would not have had EC locking 212 from R to N
I would have made the locking of 212 from N to R include (EC or 211N)"
Why? Could you give some reasons?
2."You included 134A(M/W/C) and 107E(M); I don't think I would. Ask yourself: if train routed up to 133, why shouldn't 305A(S) be set or alternatively 307A(S) be set?- so perhaps 212 should be left free."
Confused about this... any further explanation?
3?I have read your comments to Alex's work. http://www.irseexam.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=89
In Approach locking, he has the entry
Following questions are related to your reply to the point CT
1."I would not have had EC locking 212 from R to N
I would have made the locking of 212 from N to R include (EC or 211N)"
Why? Could you give some reasons?
2."You included 134A(M/W/C) and 107E(M); I don't think I would. Ask yourself: if train routed up to 133, why shouldn't 305A(S) be set or alternatively 307A(S) be set?- so perhaps 212 should be left free."
Confused about this... any further explanation?
3?I have read your comments to Alex's work. http://www.irseexam.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=89
In Approach locking, he has the entry