Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1
#13
(01-10-2010, 01:55 AM)alexgoei Wrote: Hello PJW,

I see some advantages of showing both if they do occur in the exams. One demonstrates to the examiner one can produce two types of junction signalling.

Thanks

Cheers

Alex

Absolutely. However what I am saying is that if you have already shown MAY-FA for the juncyions having whatever the "high" speed is on that layout, then show MAR for all the "default speed" turnouts
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by alexgoei - 26-09-2010, 07:32 PM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 26-09-2010, 07:52 PM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by alexgoei - 27-09-2010, 07:24 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 27-09-2010, 08:31 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 27-09-2010, 08:45 PM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by alexgoei - 29-09-2010, 10:02 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by alexgoei - 29-09-2010, 05:18 PM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 29-09-2010, 08:05 PM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by alexgoei - 30-09-2010, 05:39 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 30-09-2010, 07:17 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by alexgoei - 01-10-2010, 01:55 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 01-10-2010, 09:19 AM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by kball - 04-09-2012, 08:43 PM
RE: 2006 Attempted Layout - Part 1 - by PJW - 04-09-2012, 10:20 PM
2006 Attempted Layout - Part 2 - by alexgoei - 26-09-2010, 07:35 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)