Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2005 route tables
#2
(10-10-2010, 08:28 PM)interesting_signal Wrote: Here's my attempt at 107A(M) & (W) routes.

I've had a break from doing the controls table for a while so I'm a bit rusty, but trying to get back into the swing of it now.

I'd appreciate any comments. I haven't looked at the comments on other attempts submitted to the forum, but will do once I've finished attempting them myself.

146A(M) & (C ) added now too.

Here are comments on the first couple only so far.

Generally OK but a few things that need some attention.

As you are aware, one issue is
Comprehensive Approach Locking:
Should condition out the tracks behind a signal whose aspect does not change
i.e. EF, ED [(EC, EB, EA) or 105ARAFOAL]
a driver of a train on EA cannot ever have been given the information that 107 had been previously showing a proceed aspect if 105 had always been showing red; the aspect sequence from 107 never caused a change in 105 or 103
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2005 route tables - by interesting_signal - 10-10-2010, 08:28 PM
RE: 2005 route tables - by PJW - 13-10-2010, 07:55 AM
RE: 2005 route tables - by PJW - 14-10-2010, 08:02 AM
RE: 2005 route tables - by interesting_signal - 15-10-2010, 09:25 PM
RE: 2005 route tables - by PJW - 15-10-2010, 10:13 PM
RE: 2005 route tables - by PJW - 15-10-2010, 10:44 PM
RE: 2005 route tables - by interesting_signal - 16-10-2010, 01:54 PM
RE: 2005 route tables - by PJW - 16-10-2010, 09:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)