15-10-2010, 09:25 PM
Thanks for the feedback. All points noted.
I was a bit confused as to what the notes on the plan were trying to say re the call-on signals for running around. I can see stating my assumption would help in this situation.
Re the A/L release statement, I wrote out the whole sequence as on the advice of someone else, even when the reduced sequence was written in the control tables, the circuits may still have implemented the whole sequence, so better to write out the full statement. I'll have a look at some circuits to see a real example, but I'm hoping the examiners wouldn't deduct marks for this?!
Here's the last 2 routes.
I was a bit confused as to what the notes on the plan were trying to say re the call-on signals for running around. I can see stating my assumption would help in this situation.
Re the A/L release statement, I wrote out the whole sequence as on the advice of someone else, even when the reduced sequence was written in the control tables, the circuits may still have implemented the whole sequence, so better to write out the full statement. I'll have a look at some circuits to see a real example, but I'm hoping the examiners wouldn't deduct marks for this?!
Here's the last 2 routes.