17-01-2011, 09:42 PM
Thanks for the comments. Yes, I messed up the approach release on 111 because of where I had shown the R aspect. I'll take on board the suggestion to put the R at the bottom and less restrictive aspects at the top for future attempts. (I had put the red on top, in keeping with the notes in the study pack).
I had deliberately not shown the call-on route, but will add a note next time to clarify. However, referring to the 2010 exam paper, question 10, it says 'Draw an aspect sequence chart for all signals, routes, and classes of routes shown'. In this case, I would expect to have to show the PL aspects. Do you agree?
I had deliberately not shown the call-on route, but will add a note next time to clarify. However, referring to the 2010 exam paper, question 10, it says 'Draw an aspect sequence chart for all signals, routes, and classes of routes shown'. In this case, I would expect to have to show the PL aspects. Do you agree?