Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Answer to 2003 Part A Q2
#8
[quote=alexgoei]
Hello Peter,

I have the following points for clarification after going through your comments about answer for Point 212.  The gist of them are:

How should a point-to-point arrangement like this be reflected on a Points CT?  Do we separate the ends of the points so 212A, 212B and 212C have separate tables? (just guessing but under exam conditions very hard to do given time constraint).  Also note your comments made about this on page 63 para 5 of your
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by alexgoei - 12-08-2008, 03:53 AM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by PJW - 12-08-2008, 11:40 AM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by alexgoei - 13-08-2008, 03:09 AM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by PJW - 13-08-2008, 05:29 AM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by PJW - 22-08-2008, 04:26 PM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by PJW - 26-08-2008, 09:54 PM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by alexgoei - 01-09-2008, 02:40 AM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by PJW - 01-09-2008, 11:50 AM
RE: Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 - by PJW - 04-09-2008, 10:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)