17-09-2012, 08:24 AM
I took the approach you outline when I took module 2 because you need to prove that 3 is not adequate in order to meet the requirement that your solution is "economic". If you found that 3 was adequate, you would need to show that 2 was not, so starting at 3 is the best option.
My suggestion is thetefore that you budget in your exam plannong cor doing two sets of basic non stop calcs.
My suggestion is thetefore that you budget in your exam plannong cor doing two sets of basic non stop calcs.

