Attached here are my comments on both the Route and the Point Control Tables.
Overall these look quite good; certainly very neatly presented and almost totally free of careless slips (# see below for one!) so only a small rate of "random" error.
However there are quite a few things that look like "systematic" errors where the same "mistake" is likely to happen whenever similar circumstances apply.
Actually though, not all of these are really wrong, as I am judging against a UK understanding; some may well actually be right accrording to SRT practice. Hence I have tried to indicate in the comments those things that I believe -
a) are definite errors,
b) are possible errors,
c) might be seen as errors by the examiners unless the candidate makes it clear that their practices are subtly different from UK mainline.
Hence I have concentrated more on the generics of CT presentation and practice, rather than aiming to do a 100% of every entry. There are other attempts at these CTs including
1. a good one presented on the IRSE's format CT blanks
and
2. another detailed one which is presented on blanks similar to 11202 issue 4
which can be used to compare your CT entries for the specific routes and points.
#
I note that the route from 371 which was requested was 371D but the route that was undertaken was actually 371A (and seems to have been changed in the naming at the left but not the right of the CT). Since I am only really looking at for generic presentation I have ignored this discrepency.
Overall these look quite good; certainly very neatly presented and almost totally free of careless slips (# see below for one!) so only a small rate of "random" error.
However there are quite a few things that look like "systematic" errors where the same "mistake" is likely to happen whenever similar circumstances apply.
Actually though, not all of these are really wrong, as I am judging against a UK understanding; some may well actually be right accrording to SRT practice. Hence I have tried to indicate in the comments those things that I believe -
a) are definite errors,
b) are possible errors,
c) might be seen as errors by the examiners unless the candidate makes it clear that their practices are subtly different from UK mainline.
Hence I have concentrated more on the generics of CT presentation and practice, rather than aiming to do a 100% of every entry. There are other attempts at these CTs including
1. a good one presented on the IRSE's format CT blanks
and
2. another detailed one which is presented on blanks similar to 11202 issue 4
which can be used to compare your CT entries for the specific routes and points.
#
I note that the route from 371 which was requested was 371D but the route that was undertaken was actually 371A (and seems to have been changed in the naming at the left but not the right of the CT). Since I am only really looking at for generic presentation I have ignored this discrepency.
PJW