Arnut,
I have looked at and annotated- see attached.
Basically pretty accurate attempt, but not easy to assimilate. I'm sure you understood it correctly but there were some notes which could easily be misread as applying to an incorrect line. If you compare to Dorothy's earlier attempt you will see that it is rather clearer than yours.
However the good news is that you seemed to get the signalling correctin almost all cases.There are not marks for neatness but you do risk losing marks if examiners can't be sure what you have depicted.
I have looked at and annotated- see attached.
Basically pretty accurate attempt, but not easy to assimilate. I'm sure you understood it correctly but there were some notes which could easily be misread as applying to an incorrect line. If you compare to Dorothy's earlier attempt you will see that it is rather clearer than yours.
However the good news is that you seemed to get the signalling correctin almost all cases.There are not marks for neatness but you do risk losing marks if examiners can't be sure what you have depicted.
(26-02-2014, 06:59 PM)asrisaku Wrote: Thanks a lot Peter. Next time I will be aware of the space and I did not realize it until you pointed out to me.
PJW