The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 36 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 36 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once



IRSE Exam Forum › MODULES › Module 3 › Control Tables- Past Papers › 2009
2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables
asrisaku Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 131
Threads: 28
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 1
#11
20-04-2014, 08:46 AM
Thanks Dorothy.

371D(S)
I am getting close nearly to understand opposing routes.
378B(S): calls 235R while 371D(S) calls 235N
382A(S): calls 234N while 371D(S) calls 234R

both routes require point different position. Why do we put 378B(S) as an opposing route?

Sorry for asking lots of things.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by dorothy.pipet - 29-07-2013, 08:03 AM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by PJW - 30-07-2013, 06:18 AM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by reuben - 30-07-2013, 04:45 PM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by asrisaku - 08-04-2014, 12:54 PM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by asrisaku - 17-04-2014, 03:06 AM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by asrisaku - 19-04-2014, 06:57 AM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by asrisaku - 20-04-2014, 08:46 AM
RE: 2009 CTs on IRSE 2012 tables - by asrisaku - 21-04-2014, 06:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)