Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2012 Q11 Aspect Seq Attempt
#3
Hi Peter,

Thanks for the feedback - appreciated.

Yes - the * at 209 is meant to show 209 at Y+P4, stepping up to a 'free' aspect (on timed occupation of berth TC) depending on the state of 111 ahead, however I note you points around this - (a) that showing Y+P4/G+P4 makes no sense; (b) that FY sequence no good for train that has passed 207; © FY sequence no good if 111 at red; (d) the presentation is not great - with this 'floating' text.

If I'm on the right track, the 'fix' would be to provide a separate MAR path with 209 at red, stepping up to Y+P4 or G+P4 dependant on state of 111. The FY path should show 207 FY - 209 Y+P4 (stepping to G+P4 dependant on state of 111).

Question - how should I separate out the 111 Red path from the others? - I've shown #4 comment stating that only the MAR up to here is legitimate - is their a better way?

I've attached a re-work, (hopefully) addressing your comments - incuding the one about not showing separate Y up ROL's on the the 2011 question.

How does this look? (Just noticed I still haven't fixed the floating text!)

Thanks again,

Andy
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2012 Q11 Aspect Seq Attempt - by AndyM - 19-09-2014, 03:56 PM
RE: 2012 Q11 Aspect Seq Attempt - by Peter - 24-09-2014, 09:31 PM
RE: 2012 Q11 Aspect Seq Attempt - by AndyM - 29-09-2014, 12:09 PM
RE: 2012 Q11 Aspect Seq Attempt - by Peter - 29-09-2014, 09:11 PM
RE: 2012 Q11 Aspect Seq Attempt - by ericyang_thx - 30-09-2019, 07:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)