Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2008 results
#7
MarkN Wrote:Hi Peter,
I answered 3 questions instead of 2 so I didn't spend the time I should have on each. I also don't know how the Examiners treated my mistake.

I guess that they'd have marked all 3 but probably then used your best two to get the result. It's easy to say it but there is a lesson re preparation of what to expect and reading the paper; I bet you are kicking yourself. Look on the bright side; it's far better than the situation in which some people find themselves of leaving the exam room hoping for a Pass or better then getting th shock of a Fail result. At least you realise what you did wrong and will be sure not to repeat that mistake!

It raises a question- why does module 1 only have two questions to answer unlike all the other written questions?
Actually I think this could be one reason why the pass rate in that module is relatively low In a 3 answer paper if your response for one is a little off target then it's going to be tough to have got enough on the only other one to pull you through; whereas if 1 of 3 answers you'd probably just about make it assuming the 3rd wasn't a complete disaster and the others were reasonably above the 50%.

Thanks for sharing and being public about your goof- let's hope others as well as yourself learn from it for next year!
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2008 results - by PJW - 05-12-2008, 08:13 PM
RE: 2008 results - by adikarina - 17-12-2008, 03:55 PM
RE: 2008 results - by PJW - 22-12-2008, 07:20 PM
RE: 2008 results - by PJW - 23-12-2008, 09:03 PM
RE: 2008 results - by MarkN - 05-01-2009, 02:46 PM
RE: 2008 results - by Peter - 05-01-2009, 03:28 PM
RE: 2008 results - by PJW - 05-01-2009, 07:46 PM
RE: 2008 results - by pingram - 22-01-2009, 11:23 AM
RE: 2008 results - by PJW - 22-01-2009, 07:08 PM
RE: 2008 results - by pingram - 25-01-2009, 12:00 PM
RE: 2008 results - by PJW - 25-01-2009, 12:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)