Motty Wrote:Thanks Peter,
if I may add for clarity I suspect there's a typo under your notes for module 3, that Q3 should read Q2.
Thanks
You are right- perhaps I made my notes wrong or John A made the error. At least it proves that someone has read it!
Perhaps you get the "smug points" that Peter once offered for a mod 5 calc that noone actually took up!
Also I have been in further discussion with the mod 2 examiners re what they expect re headway calculations which I summarise below:
To further clarify what that the examiners are expecting in the calculations:
[color=#0000FF]They look for evidence that candidate understand the issues to be considered and explain assumptions.
In contrast the experience is that:
PJW