10-10-2017, 04:34 PM
It asks for additional features that you might provide in the design in order to manage any safety hazards?
What threw me was the way the second part of the question was worded. The first part are all the reason for not having a AHB and hence I said it couldn't be a AHB however, the second part reads like a AHB but because of the first part. I read the second part again and again and convinced myself it was a CCTV just because of the way it was worded i.e. "automatic level crossing system" (in this case this could be the initiation element) and "barriers which cover half the road width" (In this case a CCTV crossing which would be more suitable has 4 barrier machines which cover half the road each. Is this stretching it I wonder ?
What threw me was the way the second part of the question was worded. The first part are all the reason for not having a AHB and hence I said it couldn't be a AHB however, the second part reads like a AHB but because of the first part. I read the second part again and again and convinced myself it was a CCTV just because of the way it was worded i.e. "automatic level crossing system" (in this case this could be the initiation element) and "barriers which cover half the road width" (In this case a CCTV crossing which would be more suitable has 4 barrier machines which cover half the road each. Is this stretching it I wonder ?