11-10-2017, 08:49 AM
It seems, for part on you could have said AHB but noted the speed and location were higher risks than "normal". Part two, add OD and possible a pedestrian bridge? Some assumptions were made that the school kids used the LX. It could be the entrance is not that close and all/most actually go the other way up the road. If the foot fall is low, is the risk actually high?
Argument should consider cost, i.e. reasonable cost first (and providing what the examiner is asking for - an auto LX), then add to it (cost, complexity etc) for the latter parts of the question.
Argument should consider cost, i.e. reasonable cost first (and providing what the examiner is asking for - an auto LX), then add to it (cost, complexity etc) for the latter parts of the question.
Le coureur