19-09-2018, 09:35 AM
Looks quite good.
On part a), it might have been worth also looking at pedestrian footfall in addition to vehicular traffic. I would have also have looked at localised hazards and topography (schools, pedestrian crossings, road turnouts, blocking back, etc). The train pattern over the crossing and history of crossing abuse could also be considered. A "sufficient and suitable" level crossing risk assessment might be a good revision point for this if you have ready access to one.
On part a), it might have been worth also looking at pedestrian footfall in addition to vehicular traffic. I would have also have looked at localised hazards and topography (schools, pedestrian crossings, road turnouts, blocking back, etc). The train pattern over the crossing and history of crossing abuse could also be considered. A "sufficient and suitable" level crossing risk assessment might be a good revision point for this if you have ready access to one.