I have been sent the attached route and aspect CTs.
They are certainly equal to any of those offered for the Signet event.
Demonstrate the effectiveness of a column format Control Table but also its limitations; there is insufficient space to have separate entries for tracks, points etc at route level and at aspect level. I suggest that somehow need to annotate to clarify the dual use of these entries. Perhaps some general notes; for example haven't listed the separate ends of the various points and I think wise to cover this by a general statement.
I have tried to draw attention to particular issues but overall these were to a very reasonable standard.
They are certainly equal to any of those offered for the Signet event.
Demonstrate the effectiveness of a column format Control Table but also its limitations; there is insufficient space to have separate entries for tracks, points etc at route level and at aspect level. I suggest that somehow need to annotate to clarify the dual use of these entries. Perhaps some general notes; for example haven't listed the separate ends of the various points and I think wise to cover this by a general statement.
I have tried to draw attention to particular issues but overall these were to a very reasonable standard.
PJW