25-09-2009, 02:21 PM
Please review 2004 Point Control Table.
-Sugavanam
-Sugavanam
|
2004 Point Control Table
|
29-09-2009, 09:39 PM
30-09-2009, 07:30 PM
(29-09-2009, 09:39 PM)Peter Wrote:(25-09-2009, 02:21 PM)sugavanam nagarajan Wrote: Please review 2004 Point Control Table. 2004 203 and 211 My comments on these to are mostly of the same nature as for the 2006 ones (have a look at the comments on the ones you posted in the other thread) (timed tracks for the O/L, deadlocking tracks - both issues). I agreed with all of the routes and releases. The only areas that I think there is any issue is the representation of the swingining overlap. From what I can see, you have the right sort of idea and, in as far as I could deduce from the way you have written it, the right sort of entries are there, but I was not sure that you have got the presentation correct. You have also put that the points are set N>R and R>N by both 107A(M) and 142B(M) - again, not quite the way it should be shown. Otherwise, the tables were pretty good. Peter |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)